You are given an integer array cost where cost[i] is the cost of ith step on a staircase.
Once you pay the cost, you can either climb one or two steps.
You can either start from the step with index 0, or the step with index 1.
Return the minimum cost to reach the top of the staircase, which is the position just past the last step (index cost.length).
Example 1:
Input: cost = [10,15,20]
Output: 15
Explanation: You will start at index 1.
- Pay 15 and climb two steps to reach the top.
The total cost is 15.
Example 2:
Input: cost = [1,100,1,1,1,100,1,1,100,1]
Output: 6
Explanation: You will start at index 0.
- Pay 1 and climb two steps to reach index 2.
- Pay 1 and climb two steps to reach index 4.
- Pay 1 and climb two steps to reach index 6.
- Pay 1 and climb one step to reach index 7.
- Pay 1 and climb two steps to reach index 9.
- Pay 1 and climb one step to reach the top.
The total cost is 6.
Constraints:
2 <= cost.length <= 1000
0 <= cost[i] <= 999
Solutions
Solution 1: Memoization Search
Thinking
Start at index \(0\) or \(1\), pay the current stair, and climb one or two steps. \(n\le 1000\); plain recursion repeats stairs.
The cost from \(i\) depends only on \(i+1\) and \(i+2\); past the top it is \(0\). Memoization computes each index once.
The answer is \(\min(\textit{dfs}(0), \textit{dfs}(1))\). Time and space \(O(n)\).
We design a function \(\textit{dfs}(i)\), which represents the minimum cost required to climb the stairs starting from the \(i\)-th step. Therefore, the answer is \(\min(\textit{dfs}(0), \textit{dfs}(1))\).
The execution process of the function \(\textit{dfs}(i)\) is as follows:
If \(i \ge \textit{len}(\textit{cost})\), it means the current position has exceeded the top of the stairs, and there is no need to climb further, so return \(0\);
Otherwise, we can choose to climb \(1\) step with a cost of \(\textit{cost}[i]\), then recursively call \(\textit{dfs}(i + 1)\); or we can choose to climb \(2\) steps with a cost of \(\textit{cost}[i]\), then recursively call \(\textit{dfs}(i + 2)\);
Return the minimum cost between these two options.
To avoid repeated calculations, we use memoization search, saving the results that have already been calculated in an array or hash table.
The time complexity is \(O(n)\), and the space complexity is \(O(n)\), where \(n\) is the length of the array \(\textit{cost}\).
Solution 1 already fills the cost of leaving each stair from the top downward. Here \(f[i]\) is the cost of reaching index \(i\), which depends only on \(i-1\) and \(i-2\), so the table is filled upward and \(f[n]\) is the top.
We define \(f[i]\) as the minimum cost needed to reach the \(i\)-th stair. Initially, \(f[0] = f[1] = 0\), and the answer is \(f[n]\).
When \(i \ge 2\), we can reach the \(i\)-th stair directly from the \((i - 1)\)-th stair with one step, or from the \((i - 2)\)-th stair with two steps. Therefore, we have the state transition equation:
\(f[i]\) reads only the previous two values, so two scalars suffice. Space \(O(1)\).
We notice that the state transition equation for \(f[i]\) only depends on \(f[i - 1]\) and \(f[i - 2]\). Therefore, we can use two variables \(f\) and \(g\) to alternately record the values of \(f[i - 2]\) and \(f[i - 1]\), thus optimizing the space complexity to \(O(1)\).
Expanding every one-step and two-step choice is exponential. There can be \(1000\) stairs, and the first call always moves to the next stair, so the chain has depth \(n\). The cost of leaving stair \(i\) depends only on \(i+1\) and \(i+2\), and past the top the cost is \(0\). Set \(f[i] = \textit{cost}[i] + \min(f[i+1], f[i+2])\) and fill \(i\) from \(n-1\) down to \(0\). The answer is \(\min(f[0], f[1])\).
We let \(f[i]\) be the minimum cost of climbing from stair \(i\) to the top. When \(i \ge n\), \(f[i] = 0\). For \(i < n\),