496. Next Greater Element I
Description
The next greater element of some element x
in an array is the first greater element that is to the right of x
in the same array.
You are given two distinct 0-indexed integer arrays nums1
and nums2
, where nums1
is a subset of nums2
.
For each 0 <= i < nums1.length
, find the index j
such that nums1[i] == nums2[j]
and determine the next greater element of nums2[j]
in nums2
. If there is no next greater element, then the answer for this query is -1
.
Return an array ans
of length nums1.length
such that ans[i]
is the next greater element as described above.
Example 1:
Input: nums1 = [4,1,2], nums2 = [1,3,4,2] Output: [-1,3,-1] Explanation: The next greater element for each value of nums1 is as follows: - 4 is underlined in nums2 = [1,3,4,2]. There is no next greater element, so the answer is -1. - 1 is underlined in nums2 = [1,3,4,2]. The next greater element is 3. - 2 is underlined in nums2 = [1,3,4,2]. There is no next greater element, so the answer is -1.
Example 2:
Input: nums1 = [2,4], nums2 = [1,2,3,4] Output: [3,-1] Explanation: The next greater element for each value of nums1 is as follows: - 2 is underlined in nums2 = [1,2,3,4]. The next greater element is 3. - 4 is underlined in nums2 = [1,2,3,4]. There is no next greater element, so the answer is -1.
Constraints:
1 <= nums1.length <= nums2.length <= 1000
0 <= nums1[i], nums2[i] <= 104
- All integers in
nums1
andnums2
are unique. - All the integers of
nums1
also appear innums2
.
Follow up: Could you find an O(nums1.length + nums2.length)
solution?
Solutions
Solution 1: Monotonic Stack
We can traverse the array \(\textit{nums2}\) from right to left, maintaining a stack \(\textit{stk}\) that is monotonically increasing from top to bottom. We use a hash table \(\textit{d}\) to record the next greater element for each element.
When we encounter an element \(x\), if the stack is not empty and the top element of the stack is less than \(x\), we keep popping the top elements until the stack is empty or the top element is greater than or equal to \(x\). At this point, if the stack is not empty, the top element of the stack is the next greater element for \(x\). Otherwise, \(x\) has no next greater element.
Finally, we traverse the array \(\textit{nums1}\) and use the hash table \(\textit{d}\) to get the answer.
The time complexity is \(O(m + n)\), and the space complexity is \(O(n)\). Here, \(m\) and \(n\) are the lengths of the arrays \(\textit{nums1}\) and \(\textit{nums2}\), respectively.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
|