334. Increasing Triplet Subsequence
DifficultyMedium
Description
Given an integer array nums, return true if there exists a triple of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]. If no such indices exists, return false.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5] Output: true Explanation: Any triplet where i < j < k is valid.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [5,4,3,2,1] Output: false Explanation: No triplet exists.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [2,1,5,0,4,6] Output: true Explanation: One of the valid triplet is (1, 4, 5), because nums[1] == 1 < nums[4] == 4 < nums[5] == 6.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 5 * 105-231 <= nums[i] <= 231 - 1
Follow up: Could you implement a solution that runs in O(n) time complexity and O(1) space complexity?
Solutions
Solution 1
Thinking
Decide whether an increasing triplet of indices exists. Trying every middle index is \(O(n^2)\). We only need a smaller left value and a candidate second value.
Keep \(mi<mid\). A value above \(mid\) finishes the triplet; otherwise update \(mi\) if it is no larger, else update \(mid\). The old index of \(mid\) need not be stored: it already sits after a smaller \(mi\).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | |